金剛經纂要刊定記 1.92

1.92

其餘等者。前則各有一長，此乃都來邪僻。前則依人依教，此乃率意推胸、率爾疎謬之言。故曰：「胸談臆注不堪採覽，置之言外」，故云不足論矣。就中此釋宇內偏多。疏主云：「予久志斯經，徧詢諸疏，親見數十本。或假託金剛藏，或云志公，或云傅大士，或云達磨，或云五祖，或題自名，皆好紙好墨裝飾甚華，其中文義總不堪採。如釋舍衛國云衛者百靈衛護，舉一例諸首末皆爾，苟有無限愚人，不能甄別，寶為至妙，誠可悲哉！」

"The rest," and so forth: the previous two each had a single strength, whereas this is wholly heterodox and deviant. The previous ones relied on persons and teachings, whereas this is merely following whim and conjecturing from one's own heart—rash, negligent, and erroneous words. Therefore it says, "Heart-speculations and whimsical annotations are unworthy of perusal, set them aside beyond words"; hence it says "not worth discussing." Among these, this sort of commentary is particularly abundant in the world. The commentator states: "For a long time I set my aspiration on this sūtra, inquiring everywhere into various commentaries, and personally saw several dozen works. Some falsely attributed theirs to Vajragarbha, some claimed Master Baozhi, some Fu Dashi, some Bodhidharma, some the Fifth Patriarch, or some signed their own names. All were decorated very lavishly with fine paper and fine ink, yet the textual meanings within were completely unworthy of perusal. For instance, explaining Śrāvastī (Shewei Guo) as 'wei means a hundred spirits defend and protect'—citing this one example illustrates the rest; it was thus from beginning to end. If there are boundless foolish people who cannot discern this and treasure them as the utmost wonder, it is truly lamentable!"