金剛經纂要刊定記 6.107

6.107

真說等者。夫為說法當如法說，名真說法。法離一切名相分別，若稱此說，是如法說故。下文云：「云何為人演說，不取於相如如不動。」然第三第五第七，及此四處皆明無說者，意各不同。以第三疑化身有說，第五疑證智可說，第七明佛無異說，此文疑無身何說，以此為異。然諸疏於十八九之間，約魏本經文皆出一疑。龍外皆云：何人能信疑？雲云：能信深法疑。今秦經既無其文，疏亦不敘而解。今見近本，秦文皆有此段，乃於抄中略要敘釋，名為所說既深無信疑。論云：「若言諸佛說法者，是無所說無說，不離法身。」法身無相，有何等人能信如是甚深法界？

Regarding "true preaching," etc.: when preaching the Dharma, preaching in accord with the Dharma is called true preaching of the Dharma. The Dharma is free from all names, marks, and conceptual distinctions; if one speaks in accord with this, it is preaching in accord with the Dharma. Therefore, a later passage says: "How does one expound it for others? Without grasping at marks, thus, thus, unmoving." However, in the third, fifth, and seventh sections, as well as in this place—all four places clarify that there is no preaching, but their intentions are each different. In the third, it was doubted whether the transformation body has speech; in the fifth, it was doubted whether realized gnosis can be spoken of; in the seventh, it was clarified that the Buddha has no divergent teaching; in this text, it is doubted how there can be preaching when there is no body—such is the distinction. Moreover, between the eighteenth and nineteenth sections, all the commentaries raise a doubt based on the Wei version of the sūtra. Long and Wai both say: "The doubt: Who can have faith?" Yun says: "The doubt concerning being able to have faith in the profound Dharma." Now, since the Qin version of the sūtra lacks that text, the commentary also does not recount or explain it. Now seeing that recent editions of the Qin text all contain this passage, I have briefly and essentially recounted and explained it in my notes, naming it "the doubt that, what is preached being profound, there is no one who has faith." The treatise says: "If one says that the Buddhas preach the Dharma, it is un-preached and non-preaching, not apart from the Dharmakāya." The Dharmakāya is without marks; what kind of person can believe in such a profound dharmadhātu?