般若波羅蜜多心經幽贊 2.66

2.66

贊曰：勝空者言，前無獨覺近觀，此無聲聞近觀。故契經言，為求聲聞者說應四諦法。又說，四諦唯有假名，自性空故。然上兼下，此亦餘境，於緣起中亦修諦觀，故緣起後方說諦無。如應者言，《勝鬘經》說安立四聖諦、非安立四聖諦，如是八聖諦非二乘所知。

The commentary says: The Superior-Emptiness proponent says: Earlier there was no proximate contemplation of pratyekabuddhas; here there is no proximate contemplation of śrāvakas. Hence a sūtra states that for those seeking the śrāvaka [vehicle], he taught the corresponding Dharma of the four truths. Furthermore, it is said that the four truths are merely conventional designations; because their svabhāva is empty. However, the higher subsumes the lower, and this is also the sphere of others; within dependent origination one also practices the contemplation of the truths, so after dependent origination, the nonexistence of the truths is explained. The proponent of Conformity says: The Śrīmālā-sūtra speaks of the established four noble truths and the unestablished four noble truths; these eight noble truths are not known by the two vehicles.