法華經義記 4.57

4.57

問者又言：「知見即是盡智、無生智，然盡智、無生智祇是知見，何故避盡、無生名道知見耶？」解釋復言：「夫知見名同、知見意異，盡智、無生智成無學時具此二智，其有二義具如前說。問者所論是成無學後，為欲廣習知見得此知見，必須斷習得，是故智成功用。云何與盡智、無生智同？」

The questioner further says: "Knowledge and vision are precisely the knowledge of exhaustion and the knowledge of non-arising; moreover, the knowledge of exhaustion and the knowledge of non-arising are simply knowledge and vision. Why avoid the names of exhaustion and non-arising and speak of knowledge and vision?" The interpreter further says: "Now, the names 'knowledge and vision' are identical, but the senses of 'knowledge and vision' are different. When completing the non-learner state, one is endowed with the two knowledges of exhaustion and non-arising, which have two meanings fully stated as before. What the questioner discusses is that, after becoming a non-learner, in order to broadly cultivate knowledge and vision to obtain this knowledge and vision, one must sever habit energies to obtain it; hence the knowledge has an efficacious function. How could it be identical with the knowledge of exhaustion and the knowledge of non-arising?"