法華玄義釋籤 2.69

2.69

次料簡中合十二重問答，初三重料簡名，次一重料簡體，次一重料簡宗，次五重宗用對簡，次二重都簡五章。初問意者，為實施權，權不離實，乃至開權顯實，實不離權；廢權顯實，權若廢已，權實不二，豈不墮因中有果耶？答意者，因果名同，時異教異。外人因果既為初教所破，尚非三藏麁因麁果，況復通別？況妙因果耶？新舊醫如餘文說。

Next, in the critical examination, there are altogether twelve rounds of questions and answers: the first three rounds critically examine the name; the next one critically examines the essence; the next one critically examines the central theme; the next five critically examine the central theme and function against each other; the next two comprehensively examine all five chapters. The intention of the first question is: applying the provisional for the sake of the real, the provisional is not separate from the real; down to opening the provisional to reveal the real, the real is not separate from the provisional; discarding the provisional to reveal the real, once the provisional has been discarded, provisional and real are non-dual—does this not fall into [the heterodox view of] the effect existing within the cause? The intention of the answer is: the names of cause and effect are the same, but the times differ and the teachings differ. Since the cause and effect of outsiders have already been refuted by the initial teaching, they are not even the coarse cause and coarse effect of the Tripiṭaka [Teaching], let alone the Shared and Separate [Teachings], and let alone the wondrous cause and effect. The new and old physicians are as spoken in the other texts.