法華玄義釋籤 6.11

6.11

三釋疑中二：先立疑，次釋。釋中云「此是不共般若與二乘共說」者，諸部般若以但不但二種中道不共之法與二乘共說，如云「四諦清淨故真如清淨」等，例方等部非無此義，以方等經多順彈訶，共義稍疎，故判在般若。般若於菩薩則成共說，故至下文判麁妙中云方等有說通別入通圓入通。

Third, in resolving doubts, there are two parts: first, establishing the doubt; next, explaining. In the explanation, the statement "this is the uncommon Prajñā expounded in common with the two vehicles" means that the various divisions of Prajñā expound the uncommon dharma of the two kinds of middle path—exclusive and non-exclusive—in common with the two vehicles, as in saying "because the four truths are pure, true thusness is pure," etc. By analogy, the Vaipulya division is not without this meaning, but because the Vaipulya sūtras mostly follow reproof and scolding, the meaning of "common" is somewhat distant; therefore it is classified under Prajñā. In Prajñā, for bodhisattvas it constitutes common exposition; therefore, when reaching the lower text's classification of coarse and subtle, it says that Vaipulya has expositions of the Shared, the Separate entering the Shared, and the Perfect entering the Shared.