法華文句記 6.89

6.89

中根迷法說，故說車虛譬，有無宛然齊，智者無斯難。有人問：三車容可有上下，一城何得有出入？答：車亦無文說有下，城亦不曾說有出，車被斥虛義同下，城聞說化義同出，彼此從譬咸義立，皆已入證並須開，大車寶所既無殊，兩處妙理何差別？

Those of medium capacity were confused by the doctrinal exposition, so the empty analogy of the carriages was spoken; existence and non-existence are completely equal, and the wise have no such difficulty. Someone asked: 'Three carriages may allow getting on and off, but how can one city have exiting and entering?' Answer: The carriages also have no text saying there is getting off, and the city also never said there is exiting. Carriages being reproached as empty is synonymous with getting off; hearing that the city was conjured is synonymous with exiting. Both are established by meaning based on the analogy; both have already entered realization, and both must be opened. Since the great carriage and the treasure abode do not differ, what distinction is there in the wondrous principle of the two places?