法華玄論 4.148

4.148

評曰：不然。照空為實、鑒有為權，蓋是契中道之妙觀、離斷常之要術，法身之父母、菩薩之本行。從《波若》已上《涅槃》已還，乃至《華嚴》諸方等教皆通用之，不得偏屬《大品》。次動靜分二智者，一切方等教辨菩薩行，皆以內靜鑒為實、外動用為權貫通眾經，亦非屬《淨名》也。

Evaluation: This is not so. Illuminating emptiness as real and discerning existence as provisional are indeed the wondrous contemplation that tallies with the middle way, the essential method for avoiding annihilationism and eternalism, the father and mother of the dharmakāya, and the fundamental practice of bodhisattvas. From the Prajñā up to the Nirvāṇa, and even in the Avataṃsaka and various Vaipulya teachings, it is generally applied to all; it must not pertain exclusively to the Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā-prajñāpāramitā. Next, dividing the two wisdoms by movement and quietude: in all Vaipulya teachings that distinguish the practices of bodhisattvas, taking inner quiet discernment as real and outer active functioning as provisional runs throughout all sūtras, and does not pertain exclusively to the Vimalakīrti either.