金剛三昧經論 1.95

1.95

論曰：此下第二問答明無止息。問意言：本無妄想即無所止，所止無故能止亦無，無能止故應無始覺。如是難也。

The commentary says: Below, this is the second [section], a question-and-answer explaining the absence of cessation. The intent of the question says: If originally there is no delusive conceptualization, then there is nothing to be ceased. Because the object of cessation does not exist, the agent of cessation also does not exist; and because there is no agent of cessation, there should be no initial awakening. Such is the challenge.