大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 14.26

14.26

疏「又夫立教必須斷證」等者，二明體式有異也。亦重通妨難。難云：若各有通局，何以不得以宗為教、以教為宗？故為此通。教有斷證階位等殊故，但有五宗。約所尚各別，故有十宗。故前六所尚不同而成六宗，而斷證等齊，但為小教，則教宗無違也。

Regarding the Commentary's passage starting from "Furthermore, in establishing teachings, one must take into account eradication and realization": this is the second [point], explaining that the structural format is distinct. This also resolves an objection again. The objection says: If each has its universality and specificity, why can one not take the tenets as teachings, and the teachings as tenets? Therefore this resolution is provided. Because teachings have distinctions such as stages of eradication and realization, there are only five [teachings]. Based on their differing points of emphasis, there are ten tenets. Thus, the first six, due to differing points of emphasis, form six tenets; yet their eradication and realization are equal, and they constitute solely the Hīnayāna teaching. Hence teachings and tenets do not conflict.