大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 16.39

16.39

疏「四教義相對亦通二釋」者，以易知故不出。若具釋者，應云大方廣佛華嚴之經，揀非《涅槃》等經。故經之大方廣佛華嚴，揀非論中之所明故。而四對皆具二釋者，約行布則依主，約圓融則持業。

As for the commentary's "The opposition between teaching and meaning also admits of two explanations": because it is easy to know, it is not set forth. If explained fully, one should say "the sūtra of the Buddhāvataṃsaka-mahāvaipulya," distinguishing it from sūtras such as the *Nirvāṇa-sūtra*; thus, "the Buddhāvataṃsaka-mahāvaipulya of the sūtra" distinguishes it from that which is clarified in treatises. And that all four pairs possess two explanations means: in terms of serial progression, they are tatpuruṣa compounds; in terms of total interpenetration, they are karmadhāraya compounds.