大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 20.25

20.25

疏「尚不造善」等者，然邪說空，謂豁達無物。或言無礙，不妨造惡。若真知空，善順於理，恐生動亂，尚不起心惡背於理以順妄情，豈當更造？若云無礙不礙造惡，何不無礙不礙修習善行而斷惡耶？厭修善法恐有著心，恣情造惡何不懼著？明大邪見惡眾生也。

Regarding the commentary's "They do not even create good..." and so forth: heterodox explanations of emptiness claim that it is vast and completely empty of things, or say that non-obstruction does not prevent the creation of evil. If one truly understands emptiness, good accords with principle; fearing the creation of agitation and disturbance, one does not even give rise to a mind that evilly contradicts principle to follow deluded impulses—how much less would one actually commit [evil]? If one claims that non-obstruction does not obstruct committing evil, why would non-obstruction not allow cultivating good practices and severing evil? Loathing the cultivation of wholesome dharmas out of fear of having an attachment, yet indulging one's impulses to commit evil—why does one not fear attachment then? This clarifies sentient beings of evil and great heterodox views.