大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 32.31

32.31

疏「次遣疑」下，即釋第二番懷疑問也。由前問云：為是一性？為是種種？故今答云：常一常多。「一虛轉」者，無性故有也。「二無轉」者，無性故空也。虛轉故常種種，無轉故常一性，勿滯二途也。

From the commentary's "Next, dispelling doubts..." downward, this explains the second round of harboured doubts and questions. Because the previous question asked: "Is it of one nature? Or is it of various kinds?" now the reply states: "Constantly one, constantly many." "First, revolving illusorily" means existing because of the lack of intrinsic nature. "Second, having no revolving" means being empty because of the lack of intrinsic nature. Because it revolves illusorily, it is constantly of various kinds; because there is no revolving, it is constantly of one nature—do not stagnate in the two extremes.