大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 32.39

32.39

疏「又示現而有生」下，第二明性相相成故不相違，即是上半，即無生之性不違示生之相。言「亦無所現物，相不違性」者，雖牒第四句，連取第二句，正示現生即無所現，故不違性。

Regarding the Commentary's 'Furthermore, by manifest appearance there is arising' onward: the second clarifies that nature and characteristics mutually accomplish each other and thus do not contradict each other, which is the first half; that is, the nature of non-arising does not contradict the characteristic of manifest arising. As for the statement 'nor is there any thing manifested; characteristics do not contradict the nature': although it cites the fourth line, it connects and takes up the second line, directly [showing that] manifest arising is precisely having nothing manifested, and therefore does not contradict the nature.