大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 32.40

32.40

疏「無二為二」者，結也。一體而分能現所現，云無二而二。性相無違，為二即無二，故云圓融。豈得種種乖於一心、心性乖於種種？

Regarding the Commentary's 'being two without duality': this is the conclusion. A single essence dividing into the capable of manifesting and the manifested is called 'being two without duality.' Nature and characteristics do not contradict each other; being two is precisely non-dual, hence called perfect interpenetration. How could the various kinds conflict with the one mind, or the mind-nature conflict with the various kinds?