大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 38.33

38.33

第六住。疏「又在執應毀」者，上約不取聲相而毀為非，今明合毀，毀却順理。「商主天子經」者，彼經云「又復問文殊師利言：『若復有人毀汝所說，彼將何去？』答言：『當向得涅槃。』又問：『何緣作如是說？』答言：『一切無有不毀語言而能得至聖解脫中者。所以者何？其聖道中無有名字章句語言可說可示。若不毀者，彼等當不解脫。』又問：『何緣作如是說？』答言：『不可已得解脫復得解脫也。』」故言在執應毀。因言通理，言語性空，即是解脫，故云「就理應讚」也。

The sixth abode. Regarding the Commentary's statement "Furthermore, when there is clinging, one ought to disparage": The above was about not grasping at the characteristic of sound, so disparaging it is wrong; now it explains that it should be disparaged, for disparaging it accords with the principle. Regarding the Sūtra of the Deva Merchant Leader (Śreṣṭhīdevaputra-sūtra): That sūtra says: "Furthermore, he asked Mañjuśrī: 'If someone disparages what you have said, where will they go?' He answered: 'They will go toward attaining nirvāṇa.' He asked again: 'For what reason do you speak thus?' He answered: 'There is no one who does not disparage words and yet can attain holy liberation. Why is this? Within the holy Path, there are no names, phrases, or words that can be spoken or shown. If they do not disparage them, they will not be liberated.' He asked again: 'For what reason do you speak thus?' He answered: 'One who has already attained liberation cannot attain liberation again.'" Therefore it is said that where there is clinging, one ought to disparage. Relying on words to penetrate the principle, the nature of speech is empty, which is liberation itself; hence it is said, "In terms of principle, one ought to praise."