大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 38.53

38.53

疏「轉變密意」者，即文同義異也。如一名四實九義瞿聲。如一無常之言，小乘即以生滅為義，大乘即以不生不滅而為其義。在遍計性則無可常，在依他性即說生滅，在圓成性則以轉變。染淨為義，故云轉變。言密意者，則如前引《攝論》之中「以異言詞說異法」等。言「即如初句」下，即指初句為文隨於義，一多言同，而有三義故。

Regarding the commentary's: "Esoteric intention of transformation," this means the words are the same while the meanings differ. It is like the single word "gau" having four realities and nine meanings. Or like the single phrase "impermanence": the Hīnayāna takes arising and ceasing as its meaning, whereas the Mahāyāna takes non-arising and non-ceasing as its meaning. In the imaginary nature (parikalpita-svabhāva) there is nothing that can be permanent; in the dependent nature (paratantra-svabhāva) arising and ceasing are spoken of; in the perfected nature (pariniṣpanna-svabhāva) transformation is the meaning. Because defilement and purity are its meanings, it is called transformation. As for "esoteric intention," it is like what was cited earlier from the Mahāyānasaṃgraha: "explaining different dharmas with different expressions," and so forth. Saying "that is, like the first line" on down directly points to the first line as the text following the meaning: while the words for one and many are the same, there are three meanings.