大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 54.35

54.35

疏「是因善決定」者，是論立名。二「此有」下，論釋。三「有釋云」下，疏釋論。於中三：初敘昔；二「此順法相」下，辯順違；三「今更」下，申正釋。於中分五：一正釋。言「用雖虧盈」者，正揀智體非無常義。智體如空，空非無常。所生之色有起有滅，如用應機說為無常。言「究竟如空」者，謂畢竟無有不如空義。

The Commentary's words, "is causal good determination," is the name established in the treatise. Second, from "This has..." onward, the treatise explains it. Third, from "An explanation says..." onward, the Commentary explains the treatise. In this there are three parts: first, it recounts an earlier interpretation; second, from "This accords with the characteristics of dharmas..." onward, it analyzes accord and discord; third, from "Now, to further..." onward, it sets forth the correct explanation. Within this, there are five divisions: First is the correct explanation. The statement, "Although its function wanes and waxes," properly singles out the cognitive essence as not being impermanent. The cognitive essence is like empty space, and space is not impermanent. The form that is produced has arising and ceasing, and like function responding to capacities, it is described as impermanent. The statement, "ultimately like empty space," means that in the final analysis there is no sense in which it is not like empty space.