大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 56.15

56.15

疏「若唯取所證」下，第三反難成立。此有二難：一初地未證難。如有十德，初唯證一，豈是證如？二不通本難難。謂本難云：如本無異，何有十證？今云：當地證於一德名親證者，無異之難豈得免耶？

On the Commentary's text from “If one solely considers the object of realization…” onward: this is the third [point], establishing [the point] through counter-challenges. This contains two challenges: First, the challenge that the first ground has not yet realized [tathatā]: If tathatā has ten virtues and the first [ground] only realizes one, how could this be realizing tathatā? Second, the challenge of failing to resolve the fundamental objection: The fundamental objection says: Since tathatā is originally without difference, how can there be ten realizations? Now to say that realizing one virtue on that respective ground is called direct realization—how could that avoid the objection regarding non-differentiation?