大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 58.4

58.4

疏「論云：如是示現」下，第三總結不相似顯成過義。先舉論，從「顯與地前」下疏釋。然論此下更云「如是次第，家不相似、種性不相似、道不相似、體不相似、處不相似、生業不相似、成就不相似。如是說住此地中，是名為住。如次經云『菩薩住如是法，名住菩薩歡喜地，以不動相應故。』」釋曰：此論次第別結，皆有不相似言，則知十句不似地前。從「如是說」下，釋於結文。乍觀此論，則似唯取第四段為住如是法，以攬前三成斯相故。故全收四以總該別，皆有煩惱、無煩惱異。

Regarding the Commentary: from "The Treatise says: manifesting thus..." onward, this is the third part: generally concluding non-similarity to manifest the meaning of fault (surpassing). First, it cites the Treatise; from "Manifesting that with before the grounds..." onward, the Commentary explains. However, below this, the Treatise further says: "In this order, family is not similar, gotra is not similar, path is not similar, essence is not similar, place is not similar, action of birth is not similar, and accomplishment is not similar. Speaking thus of abiding in this ground is called abiding. As the subsequent sūtra says: 'A bodhisattva abiding in such dharmas is called abiding in the Bodhisattva's Joyful Ground, because of corresponding with immobility.'" Exegesis: In this Treatise, concluding each one specifically, all contain the word "not similar"; thus one knows that the ten clauses are not similar to before the grounds. From "Speaking thus..." onward, it explains the concluding text. At first glance, this Treatise seems to take only the fourth section as "abiding in such dharmas," because it gathers the previous three to form this characteristic. Therefore, completely gathering the four, the general covers the specific; all have the distinction of having afflictions versus lacking afflictions.