大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 59.99

59.99

疏「一所用事謂金等」者，然所貪物通於財色，論略舉財。亦可於色決貪，是邪婬境，故此不論。疏「三終起奪想為貪」等者，論經有二貪心，經云「不生貪心，不求不願，不生貪心。」多是譯人見其言重，略去一貪。復比論經，倒為其次。疏依論次，亦倒釋經，前輕後重。是則貪心含於總別，總則三句皆不貪性。

Regarding the Commentary's statement, "First, the articles of utility refer to gold and the like": the coveted objects encompass both wealth and sensual pleasure, but the treatise briefly mentions wealth. It is also possible that a resolved greed toward sensual form belongs to the realm of sexual misconduct, which is why it is not discussed here. Regarding the Commentary's statement, "Third, ultimately giving rise to thoughts of seizing constitutes covetousness," and so forth: the translation of the treatise has two instances of "covetous mind." The sūtra says: "Not giving rise to a covetous mind, not seeking, not wishing, not giving rise to a covetous mind." It is mostly that the translator, seeing the repetition, omitted one "covetous." Comparing it again to the treatise's sūtra text, the order was inverted. Following the order of the treatise, the Commentary also interprets the sūtra in reverse order, from light to heavy. Thus, the covetous mind encompasses both the general and the specific: in general, all three phrases are of the nature of non-covetousness.