大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 6.43

6.43

疏「此亦約化儀說有前後」下，辯順違。此師所立義多順理，故不辯違。於中，先出立義、後解妨難。今初。「此亦約化儀說有前後」者，頓中化法無異漸中，別說空不空即名為漸，同時說空不空即名為頓，故是化儀。其第三亦約化法，揀異前二，從多分說，故云「此亦約化儀」。

Regarding the commentary's "This is also explained in terms of the ritual of conversion as having a sequence" and below: this distinguishes agreement and contradiction. Because the doctrine established by this master mostly accords with reason, its contradiction is not argued. Within this, it first sets forth the doctrine established, and then resolves objections. Now for the first. "This is also explained in terms of the ritual of conversion as having a sequence": the converting doctrine within the sudden is no different from that within the gradual; separately explaining the empty and the non-empty is called the gradual, while simultaneously explaining the empty and the non-empty is called the sudden; therefore, it is the ritual of conversion. His third is also in terms of the converting doctrine, distinguishing it from the preceding two; speaking from the predominant aspect, it therefore says, "This is also in terms of the ritual of conversion."