大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 62.45

62.45

疏「若爾」下，第二解妨。妨次相違，答以義別。此約輕重，前約麁細故。謂常倒最重，由計心王而為常故，生邪見等，無因無果、無善無惡，故最為重。樂次輕前，但計妄樂，不必邪見執樂受常等，生過淺故。次於想行計有主宰，主宰不礙有修行故，此復次輕。計身為淨，但生妄貪，無大過故，故為最輕。

Regarding the commentary's "If so…" and so on, this is the second [point], resolving an objection. The objection is that the sequences contradict each other, and the reply shows that the principles differ. This is based on severity, whereas the former was based on coarseness and subtlety. That is to say, the inversion of permanence is the most severe, because from conceptualizing the primary mind as permanent, wrong views and the like arise, asserting that there is neither cause nor effect, neither good nor evil; hence it is the most severe. Pleasure is lighter than the former: it merely conceptualizes false pleasure, and does not necessarily hold the wrong view of grasping pleasant feeling as permanent; since the faults it generates are shallow, it is secondary. Next, conceptualizing a controlling agent in perception and formations does not obstruct the existence of cultivation; hence this is lighter still. Conceptualizing the body as pure merely generates false attachment and causes no great fault; hence it is the lightest.