大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 63.116

63.116

疏「即治所用事」者，即是本論故。論中但有書字，為所用事中忘障。「取與」下，即論釋此障。論但通云取與寄付。「聞法思義」，作不作事、已作未作事、應作不應作事，此對治故書。釋曰：今以義節論文，於此一障自為三節，謂一事中障、二解中障、三業中障。便以疏解意。言作不作者，但作者書之言作，不作者書之言不作，未必惡不作而善作也。下二準之。

Regarding the commentary's: "Namely remedying the affairs in which one is employed": This is because it is the root treatise. In the treatise there is only the character "writing," as an obstacle of forgetfulness in the affairs in which one is employed. From "Taking and giving" downward, it is the treatise's explanation of this obstacle. The treatise merely speaks generally of taking, giving, depositing, and entrusting. "Hearing the Dharma and contemplating the meaning," matters done and not done, matters already done and not yet done, matters that should be done and should not be done: writing remedies these. Explanation: Dividing the treatise text by meaning here, for this single obstacle there are naturally three sections: first, obstacles in affairs; second, obstacles in understanding; third, obstacles in action. One then uses the commentary to explain the meaning. Saying "done and not done": one merely writes "done" for what was done, and writes "not done" for what was not done, not necessarily that evil is not done and good is done. The latter two are patterned after this.