大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 65.42

65.42

疏「下別釋」下，二別開二倒。前意由迷緣性，故是愚癡無我。執我，故是顛倒。從「以著我故」下，論舉經意，明倒所以。第二意明，迷於緣起，不知從緣無真實故，即是愚癡。疑惑不決，即是顛倒。從「謂無智故」下，以經釋成。無智求有，釋成愚癡。「滯斷常」下，釋成疑惑。「致緣相之相續」，釋疑是倒義。

Regarding the Commentary's "Below, it specifically explains…" down: second, it specifically opens up the two inversions. The former purport is that due to being deluded about the nature of conditions, it is delusion without self. Grasping at a self, it is therefore inversion. From "Because of attachment to self" down, the treatise cites the intention of the sūtra to clarify the reason for inversion. The second purport clarifies that being deluded about dependent origination and not knowing that [things] arising from conditions lack reality is precisely delusion. Hesitating in doubt and being undecided is precisely inversion. From "Because it means lacking cognition" down, it uses the sūtra to explain and establish it. Lacking cognition and seeking existence explains and establishes delusion. From "Stagnating in annihilation and permanence" down, it explains and establishes doubt. "Leading to the continuity of the characteristics of conditions" explains the meaning of doubt being inversion.