大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 78.52

78.52

疏「別則品名」下，疏文有二：先總、後別。總中，言「品明所行非說人體」者，密彈苑公，以彼釋云「普者遍也，賢者善也。行者，道也因也。謂若依若正普遍法界塵毛為普，具滿眾善德海為賢，得道不捨因行為之因行。」後便廣引〈普賢三昧品〉中釋普賢身周遍之義，曾不說於行行之相故。又以普屬人、賢屬德。故今彈云：為此以人取行，非說普賢之身。

Regarding the Commentary's statement from "Specifically, the title of the chapter..." downward, the text of the Commentary has two parts: first, general; second, specific. In the general part, the statement "The chapter elucidates the practices performed, not the essence of the person who speaks" tacitly criticizes Master Yuan, because he explained: "'Universal' (pu) means everywhere; 'sage' (xian) means virtuous. 'Practice' (xing) is the path and the cause. That is, whether insentient or sentient environments, pervading the dust motes and hair tips of the dharmadhātu is universal; possessing the full ocean of all virtues and goodness is sage; attaining the path and not abandoning the causal practices is the causal practice of it." Subsequently, he broadly quoted from the "Samantabhadra Samādhi Chapter" to explain the meaning of Samantabhadra's body being omnipresent, without ever explaining the characteristics of the implementation of the practices. Furthermore, he attributed "universal" to the person and "sage" to virtue. Therefore, the present text criticizes him, stating: for this reason, one takes the practice from the person; it does not speak of Samantabhadra's body.