大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 36.53

36.53

From the Commentary's "If one asserts a double negation..." onward, it directly explains the third verse. Because the Commentary above reiterated the preceding text to generate this verse, it therefore directly explains it here. Therein, it first presents what is refuted; next, from "Hence distinguishing that arising thoughts are all false" onward, it directly refutes it with the verse. "Arising thoughts are all false; only terminating thought is real" explains its first half. "Thought fundamentally does not exist; this termination is also extinguished" explains its second half, because nature-emptiness is thoughtless and also inconceivable.