大般涅槃經集解 16.16

16.16

案僧亮曰：二教相違，不應兩實，必應一是一虛妄也。亦有所犯者，雖自持戒，不治破戒，法滅不救，亦非我弟子。不治尚犯，況應禮耶？僧宗曰：亦有所犯者，如今日所制，昔日小乘持戒亦有所犯也。明駿案：「又如佛說」以下，舉今之教以結難也。「如佛言曰」以下，引昔教以成難也。

Sengliang comments: The two teachings contradict each other and cannot both be true; one must be true and one false. 'Also have offenses': although they uphold the precepts themselves, they do not punish those who break precepts; when the Dharma is perishing they do not rescue it, so they are not my disciples either. If not punishing is still an offense, how much more so paying homage? Sengzong says: 'Also have offenses' means: as regulated today, the past Hīnayāna precept-holding also had offenses. Mingjun comments: From 'Furthermore, just as the Buddha said' downward, it raises the present teaching to conclude the objection. From 'As the Buddha said' downward, it cites the past teaching to establish the objection.