大般涅槃經集解 20.20

20.20

案僧亮曰：後文有證也。若定有佛性，是名染著；若定無佛性，是名妄語也。僧宗曰：第五更舉理以驗惑為罪也。謂生死有我者，計我之家，何以稱染耶？而言染者，當知邪𮘫不稱理也。寶亮曰：第五教行人離於執著也。云未來身一體三寶，不應謂如質像之法執著而取也。

Sengliang comments: There is proof in the subsequent text. If one holds that the buddhadhātu definitely exists, this is called defiled attachment; if one holds that the buddhadhātu definitely does not exist, this is called false speech. Sengzong comments: The fifth again cites the principle to verify that delusion is a fault. Regarding those who claim there is a self in saṃsāra: for the school that posits a self, why is it called defilement? Since it is called defilement, one should know that erroneous bias does not accord with the principle. Baoliang comments: The fifth teaches practitioners to depart from grasping and attachment. Regarding the unified Three Jewels of the future person, one should not grasp and seize upon them as if they were material forms.