大般涅槃經集解 32.60

32.60

案法瑤曰：苦理實爾，可以名定，審為實諦也。又名菩薩辨苦得實為實諦也。下三諦義亦同也。如來非諦，具如前解，故不句句釋。僧宗曰：第二重釋所以也，言是無常遷流斷壞之法也。寶亮曰：第二階釋異也。何以故如來之實非四諦實？苦者是可斷除法，如來實不可斷除，故不同也。

Fayao notes: "The principle of suffering is truly so, can be determined by name, and is examined as the truth of reality. It also means that a bodhisattva, distinguishing suffering and attaining the real, takes it as the truth of reality. The meaning of the three truths below is also the same. That the Tathāgata is not a truth has been explained in full above, and so is not explained line by line." Sengzong notes: "The second layer explains the reason, saying that it is an impermanent, fluctuating, severed, and destructible dharma." Baoliang notes: "The second stage explains the difference. Why is the Tathāgata's reality not the reality of the four truths? Suffering is a dharma that can be severed, whereas the Tathāgata's reality cannot be severed; therefore they are not the same."