大般涅槃經集解 52.50

52.50

案僧亮曰：釋所以不說見說者之過也。寶亮曰：既已略明因緣之法非定有定無，下即出惑體以對之。從緣起，所以非無也；貪無自性，所以非有也。貪之與解脫，皆無自性也。

Sengliang states: This explains why he does not state the faults of those who hold such views. Baoliang says: Having already briefly clarified that conditioned phenomena are neither definitively existent nor definitively non-existent, below he brings forth the substance of delusion to contrast with it. Arising from conditions, it is therefore not non-existent; greed lacks self-nature, it is therefore not existent. Both greed and liberation lack self-nature.