大般涅槃經集解 30.30

30.30

Daosheng comments: He makes the objection against erroneously giving rise to the notion of pleasure regarding lesser suffering. Sengliang comments: The second clarifies the reciprocal answer: If pleasure is spoken of because of lesser suffering, showing that all is suffering, then now suffering should also be spoken of because of lesser pleasure, and one should know that all is pleasure. Baoliang says: Second, he inverts and counters the Tathāgata's preceding meaning: if the three feelings are entirely suffering, now the three feelings are entirely pleasure, and it is only suffering because the pleasure is slight.