大般涅槃經集解 33.4

33.4

Sengliang states: Above, having inquired about the true, he next inquires about the four inversions. If they do not enter the four truths, then the real truth does not subsume all dharmas; below, down to the Buddha's explanation, it is also like this. From 'the one path' onward, it does not challenge that the subsumption of the real is not comprehensive; rather, it ensures that the explanation of the real is not confused. Fayao states: The preceding text clarified that the four truths are all called real truths, which seemed to suggest that inversions and false errors are not subsumed under the truths of suffering and origination; therefore this question was raised. Baoliang states: Explaining the second, the reality of the object. He asks whether there are inversions within the four truths; if there are, how can they be called real? If the four truths lack them, then outside the four truths there should be further dharmas.