大般涅槃經義記 3.210

3.210

第二釋中，初先徵問「我以何故道其無犯」，下對釋之。於中舉犯以顯無犯，「我常說言四波羅夷若犯一者，猶如折石」正舉犯過，「若有自說得過人」下辯其犯相，「何以故」下釋顯犯相，「如是人」下結成犯過，謂退出世聖人之法。

In the second, explanatory [point], first it poses a question: "For what reason do I say that he has no transgression?" Below, it responds and explains it. Therein, it raises transgression to reveal the absence of transgression: "I always say that of the four pārājikas, if one commits even one, it is like a broken stone" directly raises the fault of transgression; from "If one claims to have attained superhuman [dharmas]" and below distinguishes the characteristics of his transgression; from "For what reason?" and below explains and reveals the characteristics of the transgression; from "Such a person" and below concludes the fault of transgression, meaning falling away from the supramundane dharmas of the noble ones.