大般涅槃經義記 3.209

3.209

就初邪中先明無犯，「若說是人得罪」已下對之辯邪。前中有四：一略明無犯、二「何以」下釋、三廣明無犯、四「何以」下釋。就初略中，「或有比丘實不毀犯波羅夷罪」正明無犯，如下文說有諸比丘少欲知足，住空閑處，人謂是聖，禮拜讚嘆，比丘不受，名實不犯。「眾人」已下明邪見人謂此比丘實犯重罪，「如是」已下如來以理彰其無犯。

Within the first heterodox [position], it first clarifies the absence of transgression; from "If it is said that this person incurs guilt" and below, it counters it and distinguishes the heterodox. The former part has four [points]: first, briefly clarifying the absence of transgression; second, "Why?" and below explains it; third, extensively clarifying the absence of transgression; fourth, "Why?" and below explains it. Within the first, brief [point], "There may be a monk who in truth does not violate a pārājika offense" directly clarifies the absence of transgression, just as the text below says that there are monks of few desires and contentment who dwell in quiet places, whom people consider to be sages and bow down to and praise, yet the monks do not accept this, which is called truly having no transgression. From "The multitude" and below clarifies that people of heterodox views consider this monk to have truly committed a grave offense; from "Such" and below, the Tathāgata through principle demonstrates his absence of transgression.