大般涅槃經義記 6.332

6.332

就初段中，「如王所言，父王無辜，橫加逆害」牒王前語，此為破父，餘乘舉來，「何者是」下正破其父。於中初就陰入界等三科法門徵責其父，「若色是」下別就五陰徵破實父：「若色是父，四陰應非」縱色破心；「若四是父，色亦應非」縱心破色；「若色非色合為父者，無有是處」雙破色心以為父義。

In the first section: "As the king said, 'The king, my father, was innocent, yet unjustly subjected to perverse murder'" cites the king's previous words. This is in order to dismantle the father, bringing up the rest in passing. From "which one is [the father]?" onward, it properly dismantles his father. Therein, it first interrogates and refutes his father with respect to the three categories of aggregates, sensory bases, and elements; from "if form is" onward, it specifically interrogates and dismantles a real father with respect to the five aggregates: "if form is the father, the other four aggregates should not be" concedes form to dismantle mind; "if the four [aggregates] are the father, form should also not be" concedes mind to dismantle form; "if form and non-form unite to be the father, this is impossible" doubly dismantles the meaning of form and mind combining to be the father.