大般涅槃經義記 8.81

8.81

下次明其色是倒有，句別有四：一明色是有。二「何等」下明色其倒，先徵後辯。三「以顛倒」下顯色是倒，約貪顯之，「倒故生貪」正明是倒，「若色非倒，云何生貪」難破非倒。四「以生貪」下顯色是有，約貪顯之，「以生貪故，非不是有」下次翻前辯明菩薩見空非倒，「以是義故，修空非倒」總明非倒。以前色貪倒有義故，修空翻之，不名顛倒。「一切凡」下別明非倒，「凡夫見女，即生女相」舉凡顯聖，「菩薩不」下辯聖異凡，「菩薩雖見，不生女相」翻前色有以明不倒，以不生等翻前貪有以明不倒。

Next, it explains that form is an inverted existence, in which there are four distinct clauses: First, it explains that form exists. Second, from "What is..." onward, it explains the inverted nature of form, first inquiring and then explaining. Third, from "Because of inversion..." onward, it reveals that form is inverted, showing it in terms of greed; "arising greed because of inversion" directly clarifies that it is inverted, while "if form were not inverted, how could greed arise?" refutes [the claim that it is] non-inverted through a challenge. Fourth, from "Because greed arises..." onward, it reveals that form exists, showing it in terms of greed; from "Because of greed arising, it is not non-existent" onward, it reverses the preceding to explain that the bodhisattva's seeing of emptiness is not inverted; "For this reason, cultivating emptiness is not inverted" generally explains non-inversion. Because of the previous meaning that form and greed are inverted existences, cultivating emptiness reverses them and is not called inverted. From "All ordinary beings..." onward, it specifically explains non-inversion; "ordinary beings see a woman and immediately produce the mark of a woman" raises the ordinary to reveal the noble; from "the bodhisattva does not..." onward, it distinguishes the noble as different from the ordinary; "the bodhisattva, though seeing, does not produce the mark of a woman" reverses the previous existence of form to explain non-inversion, and through not producing [the mark], etc., reverses the previous existence of greed to explain non-inversion.