涅槃經遊意 1.117

1.117

言不齊者，明涅槃非名無名強為涅槃立名，就強名中論翻不翻。何者？涅槃別總故翻而無翻，涅槃總別故無翻而翻。不翻而翻亦名為滅度，亦名無累解脫等；翻而不翻，則三德圓滿無所不含。豈可以一義翻耶？故涅槃具總別義，故具有翻不翻也。

As for inequality: it clarifies that because nirvāṇa is neither named nor nameless, a name is forcibly established for nirvāṇa, and within this forced naming one discusses translating or not translating. How so? Because nirvāṇa takes the specific as the general, it is translated and yet untranslated; because nirvāṇa takes the general as the specific, it is untranslated and yet translated. Being untranslated and yet translated, it is also called 'extinction and crossing over' (miedu) and also called 'unburdened liberation' and so forth; being translated and yet untranslated, the three virtues are fully perfected and leave nothing uncontained. How could it be translated by a single meaning? Therefore nirvāṇa possesses both the general and specific meanings, and hence it possesses both translation and non-translation.