涅槃經遊意 1.131

1.131

第三師云：真諦絕、涅槃不絕者，亦不然。若真諦絕涅槃不絕者，真諦妙涅槃不妙，真諦空涅槃不空，二種皆空則二皆絕也。彼云真諦妙無，涅槃妙有，二種有無，雖異而是妙，既皆妙則應皆絕，一絕一不絕則一妙一不妙也。

The third master says: ultimate truth transcends, but nirvāṇa does not transcend—this is also not correct. If ultimate truth transcends and nirvāṇa does not transcend, then ultimate truth would be wondrous while nirvāṇa would not be wondrous, and ultimate truth would be empty while nirvāṇa would not be empty; if both kinds are empty, then both transcend. That [master] says ultimate truth is wondrous nonexistence and nirvāṇa is wondrous existence; although existence and nonexistence in these two kinds differ, both are wondrous. Since both are wondrous, both should transcend; if one transcends and one does not transcend, then one is wondrous and one is not wondrous.