涅槃經遊意 1.190

1.190

第二、開善、莊嚴並云是善非復無記。次通彼二種無記之善，莊嚴明知解應是善。開善通三性，闡提是惡，佛則是善也。果報者，生死之中多有異具，故果報可是無記；佛果唯有習果，無復報法，寧可類此是無記耶？

Second, both Kaishan and Zhuangyan say that it is wholesome and no longer neutral. Next, in resolving those two kinds of neutrality as wholesome: Zhuangyan explains that cognition should be wholesome. Kaishan applies it to the three natures: an icchantika is unwholesome, while a Buddha is wholesome. As for retribution: in saṃsāra there are many varied conditions, so retribution can be neutral; the Buddha-fruit has only the fruit of habituation and no longer has retributive dharmas, so how could it be categorized as neutral like this?