涅槃經遊意 1.235

Language: Classical Chinese

1.235

第三、光宅師作例解如今：以無常之智，照常住之法；而不逐境之智是常。此亦不可！智既不同境常者，亦以常住之智，照無常之境，豈應逐境無常耶？

Third, Master Guangzhai made an analogical explanation like this: by means of impermanent cognition, one illuminates permanent dharmas; yet the cognition that does not pursue objects is permanent. This is also unacceptable! Since cognition does not share the permanence of its object, then if one illuminates impermanent objects with permanent cognition, should it not likewise follow that it is impermanent by pursuing objects?
English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Previous: 1.234
Next: 1.236
Up: 1

Translations (1)

English (machine translation) — English, machine translation