涅槃經遊意 1.243

1.243

第二解不同此說，明佛知是靈智之智，真諦是無智之境，兩體既殊，豈可研此有智之法，同無知之境？但會之既極，詺為冥耳，豈得有冥異會耶？

The second explanation disagrees with this, explaining that the Buddha's cognition is the cognition of conscious wisdom, while the ultimate truth is an object devoid of cognition. Since the two essences are distinct, how could one grind down this dharma endowed with cognition to make it identical with an object devoid of cognition? It is only that when convergence reaches its utmost, it is designated as "merging"; how could there be a "merging" distinct from "converging"?