涅槃經遊意 1.66

1.66

彼云我亦有得、無得義。至忘為無得，彌存為有得。今責汝妄不可為存，存不可為妄。真絕不可待，俗待不可絕。還成有所得。何謂無得耶？

They say: "We also have the meanings of acquisition and non-acquisition. Reaching oblivion is non-acquisition, and ever-persisting is having acquisition." Now we reprove you: Delusion cannot be taken as persistence, and persistence cannot be taken as delusion. The ultimate transcending cannot depend on relativity, and conventional relativity cannot be transcended. It turns out to be having something that is acquired again. How could it be called non-acquisition?