注維摩詰經 5.84

5.84

肇曰：上因正智明空，恐惑者將謂空義在正不在邪，故問空義之所在，以明邪正之不殊也。生曰：言之誠已盡，然而惑者猶未能全信，故復請效斯語以悟之焉。前推理實為空極，分別亦空，空則無相矣。若果以無相空為實者，於何求之得其然耶？

[Seng]zhao says: Above, relying on correct wisdom to elucidate emptiness, fearing that the deluded might suppose that the meaning of emptiness lies in the correct and not in the erroneous, he therefore asks where the meaning of emptiness resides, in order to make clear that the erroneous and the correct are not different.
[Dao]sheng says: The explanation has truly already been exhaustive, yet those who are deluded still cannot have complete faith; hence he again requests to test these words so as to awaken them. Earlier, inferring the reality of the principle culminated in emptiness, and discrimination is also empty, so emptiness is devoid of characteristics. If one indeed takes emptiness devoid of characteristics as reality, where does one seek it to find it to be so?