注維摩詰經 6.336

6.336

什曰：以其解法無得則理會於法，故因其所會假名為得。肇曰：推心而答也。無得故有得，有得則無得，此明真得乃在於不得。

[Kumāra]jīva says: Because his understanding of dharmas has no attainment, the principle tallies with the Dharma; therefore, by virtue of what is tallied with, it is provisionally designated as attainment. [Seng]zhao says: He answers by examining his own mind. Because there is no attainment, there is attainment; if there is attainment, then there is no attainment. This makes clear that true attainment lies precisely in non-attainment.