維摩經略疏 3.88

3.88

問：上明空行，就二教入空。今無我行亦為二不？答：文雖是一，亦得兩釋。何者？如言無主為如地，若分別破地得無主，三藏無我。若體法性我性皆如，我及諸法畢竟無有，即通教無我。

Question: Above, the practice of emptiness was explained as entering emptiness according to two teachings. Is the practice of non-self now also twofold? Answer: Although the text is unitary, it also admits of two explanations. How so? For instance, stating that "having no master, it is like the earth": if one distinguishes and dismantles the earth to arrive at having no master, that is the non-self of the Tripiṭaka [teaching]. If one realizes that the nature of phenomena and the nature of self are both Suchness, and that the self and all phenomena are ultimately non-existent, that is the non-self of the Shared Teaching.