維摩經略疏 9.67

9.67

問：若言不生不滅是入不二門者，如富蘭那亦說不生不滅，六十二見亦計有不生不滅不可說藏，亦應是門。若其非者，有何等異？答：六十二見邪心虛畫，皆是情說不生不滅，非是隨智悟道之門。尚不得小乘之理，何況得與不思議不生不滅門同也。

Question: If it is said that neither arising nor ceasing is entering the gate of non-duality, then as Pūraṇa [Kāśyapa] also spoke of neither arising nor ceasing, and the sixty-two views also postulated an ineffable storehouse of neither arising nor ceasing, they should also be gates. If they are not, what is the difference?
Answer: The sixty-two views are vain delineations of a deviant mind; they are all deluded assertions of neither arising nor ceasing, not gates of awakening to the Path in accord with wisdom. They do not even attain the principle of the Small Vehicle, so how could they be identical to the inconceivable gate of neither arising nor ceasing?