維摩經略疏垂裕記 1.165

1.165

二、通別，二：初、正釋，三：初、明束三為二。二、「眾經」下，釋二序名義。三、「今因」下，示序因名立。「因別名有別序」者，荊溪云：如因維摩不思議名，得有合蓋等不思議事。因於經字，得有如是我聞等言。「及約行理通別」者，若無行理，何須此教？況無此三，事同魔說，故一切經皆具此三及以通別。具如《法華疏記》。

Second, common and distinct, which has two parts: first, directly explaining, which has three parts: first, clarifying the subsumption of the three into two; second, from "Various sūtras..." below, explaining the names and meanings of the two prefaces; third, from "Now, because..." below, showing that the preface is established due to the name. Regarding "Due to the distinct name, there is a distinct preface": Jingxi says: "Just as due to Vimalakīrti's inconceivable name, there can be inconceivable events such as joining the canopies; and due to the word 'sūtra', there can be words such as 'Thus have I heard.'" Regarding "and in terms of practice and principle, common and distinct": if there were no practice and principle, why would one need this teaching? Moreover, without these three, the matter would be identical to Māra's speech; hence all sūtras possess these three as well as common and distinct, fully as in the Commentary and Subcommentary on the Lotus Sūtra.