維摩經略疏垂裕記 2.40

2.40

二、「問」下，釋疑。問意者，荊溪云：依前藏通已下文為問也。答中意，前云不得名薩埵者，以無別圓薩埵義故。今云少有慈悲等者，藏通菩薩亦有慈悲，但異二乘，得名菩薩。前云非薩埵者，意令別起別圓慈悲，方乃別受薩埵之稱。但藏通菩薩觀行同小，故別斥之。通得名者，各從當教。今云少有慈悲，意欲還取藏通菩薩合成四種。

Second, from "Question" onwards, resolving doubts. As for the intent of the question, Jingxi says: it raises a question based on the preceding text from the Tripiṭaka and Common [teachings] downwards. In the answer, the meaning is: previously it was said that they cannot be called sattva because they lack the sattva meaning of the Separate and Perfect [teachings]. Now it is said that they possess a small measure of compassion, etc.: the bodhisattvas of the Tripiṭaka and Common [teachings] also have compassion, yet they merely differ from the two vehicles and obtain the name bodhisattva. Previously it was said that they are not sattva because the intention was to prompt them to distinctively give rise to the compassion of the Separate and Perfect [teachings], and only then distinctly receive the title of sattva. However, because the contemplative practice of the bodhisattvas of the Tripiṭaka and Common [teachings] is identical to that of the Small [Vehicle], they were specifically rebuked. That they generally obtain the name is according to each respective teaching. Now speaking of having a small measure of compassion is intended to bring back and take the bodhisattvas of the Tripiṭaka and Common [teachings] to synthesize four kinds.