維摩經略疏垂裕記 5.99

5.99

二、「若止」下，二空攝屬，借如《阿含》但明二空，而法攝平等，故知三空處處具足。「涅槃空」等者，尚攝涅槃，何況平等，以平等但是起生法平等見故。此見須破，故有能所。

Second, from "If merely" downward, their subsumption under the two emptinesses: by way of comparison, as the Āgamas explain only the two emptinesses while the [emptiness of] phenomena subsumes impartiality, one knows that the three emptinesses are fully present in every context. Regarding "emptiness of nirvāṇa" and so forth: it even subsumes nirvāṇa, how much more so impartiality, because impartiality is merely the arising of the view of the impartiality of beings and phenomena. Since this view must be broken, there are the capable [grasper] and the object [grasped].